Friday, November 14, 2008

M. Bakri Musa's Malaysian Obama

Note to A Malaysian Obama

M. Bakri Musa

On Tuesday November 4th, 2008, America became, in the words of comedian Jon Stewart, more of a “show” nation and less of a “tell” one. In electing Barack Obama, America shows the world that it is now closer to being that “more perfect Union,” to quote the preamble to its constitution. Nations are like people; it matters not where you have been, more important is where you are headed.

In his victory speech Obama cited 106-year old Ann Dixon Cooper from the South who recalls only too well the time when women and blacks were not allowed to vote. The fate of blacks was worse. In his stirring speech Obama challenged Americans to imagine their nation a century hence; what his young daughters would experience should they be lucky enough to live as long as Ms. Cooper. Would they too see comparable progress as that witnessed by her?

Obama’s victory captured the world’s imagination, especially in Kenya where his father was born, and also in Malaysia, but for a far different reason. I had intimation of this when on meeting Malaysian students in New York the weekend before the elections I was asked whether Malaysia is ready for her own Barack Obama. Before replying, I countered with a question of my own: Is there a Malaysian Obama, or more specifically, is Malaysia capable of producing one?

Labeling Barack Obama

Obama is the product of a white mother and a black father. To be sure, they were no ordinary parents; both had PhDs, with his father’s from Harvard. Obama however was brought up for the most part by his maternal grandparents, a solid Middle America couple from Kansas.

In achievements, Barack followed the trajectory more typical of an ambitious white middle class family: exclusive “prep” school and an Ivy League education. While Obama could throw a mean basketball hoop, his climb to the top was through academics, not athletics or music. Stated differently, Obama’s path to success hews closer to a Kennedy than a Kareem Abdul Jabbar. Obama adopted the faith of his mother and grandparents, not of his Muslim father or stepfather, which is a minority albeit a fast-growing faith in America.

In his speeches, from the imageries and metaphors he uses down to his accent and delivery, Obama is more Jack Kennedy than Jesse Jackson, more Cambridge, Massachusetts than Southside Chicago. Obama’s favorite expression is, “My fellow Americans!” not, “Yo! Brother!” Obama favors conservative dark suits and well trimmed look, not brash-colored Afro suits and daring hairdo.

Culturally at least, Obama is more white than black. Indeed, during the early part of his political campaign, he had to fight hard the widely-held perception in the black community that he “ain’t black enough.”

Yet to the dominant American society, Obama is labeled black, not white. The reason is obvious; he carries the physical features of a black, including or especially his skin color. During the intense campaign there were concerted efforts to paint him as being “not one of us.” This would have happened even if he were a conservative with a waspish name like Alan Lee Keyes and not a foreign one like Barack Hussein Obama.

In particular, Obama had to constantly deny that he was a Muslim. It is doubtful that Obama would have secured his party’s nomination, let alone the election, had he been a Muslim. This does not mean that America is anti-Muslim rather that it is not quite yet ready to accept someone from a minority faith to be in the White House. A generation ago America had difficulty digesting the fact that a Catholic would be president. This recent election season also saw during the Republican primaries misgivings about Mitt Romney’s Mormon faith.

The path to “a more perfect Union,” while steady, is slow.

Contrast that to Malaysia. There are many children of Malay-Caucasian as well as Malay-Chinese and Malay-Indian marriages exhibiting very “un-Malay” features. Yet Malay culture has been very welcoming of them, unhesitatingly embracing them as Malays. This is not a recent phenomenon. I had many childhood friends and classmates who had distinctly Chinese or Indian appearances because of adoption or mixed marriages, yet they were all considered and treated as Malays.

Why the children of mixed marriages between a member of the majority and a minority are not regarded as the majority in America, but they are in Malaysia, is an observation worth pondering. I am certain this is related to an underlying obsession with “racial purity.”

On this point, as a Malay I am heartened that my culture is very welcoming of those who are adopted, from mixed marriages, and do not look like us, whatever that presumed “Malay appearance” might be. We are, thankfully, not consumed with maintaining our “purity.”

My view is that Malaysia already has her Barack Obama in the person of Mahathir Muhamad. We do not recognize him as such because unlike in America where its Obama is considered a member of the minority, Malaysia’s majority Malays warmly and quickly embrace their Obama as one of their own. Nor is Mahathir alone; earlier leaders like Datuk Onn and Tunku Abdul Rahman also had mixed ancestry.

By biological heritage, Obama has equal claim to being black or white. Yet because of his unalterable physical characteristics Obama is labeled black. Even if Obama were to resort to the miracles of plastic surgery, skin-whitening cream, and hair coloring and straightening a la Michael Jackson, which Obama does not, he would still be labeled black.

For contrast, examine the group portrait of UMNO Supreme Council members. If they were to dispense with their songkok and Baju Melayu and instead put on modern attire, some of them could easily be mistaken as delegates from MCA or MIC, that is, until they open their big mouth and chant their chauvinistic slogan of Ketuanan Melayu!

Malaysian Obama Wannabe

Malaysians do not recognize their Obamas because they have adopted and are comfortable with the cultural values of the majority; they consider themselves and are being treated as a member of that majority.

Our Malaysian Obamas are comfortable with and have successfully adopted the dominant culture. They are fluent in Malay, not the language of their forefathers, just like Obama cannot speak a word of Swahili, or whatever language his late father used in Kenya.

The heroes Obama invokes are Jefferson and Lincoln, not some Mau Mau chief or Zulu King. Likewise, a Malaysian Obama wannabe must invoke local heroes, not Churchill, Nehru, or Mao. Similarly, just as Obama has a fondness for conservative business suits and not colorful Kenyan robes, his Malaysian wannabe must not only be comfortable in songkok and batik, but must also look good in them. You will not endear yourself to the majority (which is the first step to earning their votes) if you balk at wearing the songkok when in the palace to pay homage to the King or Sultan, or entering their place of worship wearing a short skirt and dispensing with a headscarf.

Clearly Malaysia is not only ready for a Barack Obama, it has already produced many. However, if we dispense with the racial label and ask the more substantive question of whether Malaysia could produce a future leader the caliber and transforming character of Barack Obama, then the answer is more complex and problematic.

Obama captures the imagination of Americans with his brilliance, eloquence, and charisma. He appeals to their finer instincts; he brings Americans together, transcending class, region, and most of all, race.

Despite all that it is well to be reminded that Obama would not have secured his party’s nomination if the Democratic Party had adopted the procedures of the Republican Party, with its winner-takes-all rules. Had the Democrats done that, Hilary Clinton would have been their nominee, not Obama.

For another, Obama owes his meteoric rise in the Democratic Party to many senior party leaders, in particular his fellow senator and himself a former presidential candidate, John Kerry. It was Kerry who spotlighted Obama by giving him a slot to address the Democratic National Convention in 2004 that catapulted Obama to the national scene. Obama followed that with his stirring all-American success story in his bestselling autobiographies, Dreams of My Father and The Audacity of Hope.

I am certain that Allah in His justness has also blessed Malaysia with individuals with the leadership talent and charisma of Obama. Whether they would be nurtured by our institutions would be the biggest challenge. Our schools and universities would more than likely stunt their development.

Even if such individuals were lucky enough to escape the local system by attending international schools in Malaysia and then proceeding to great universities abroad, there is little reason to expect that they would be welcome back home. More than likely such scarce talents would have been seduced by the more lucrative and challenging opportunities abroad. Even if they were to return home they would have been tempted by the more rewarding careers in the private sector.

This problem is not unique to Malaysia but also plagues the developing world. It also afflicts economically “First World” but culturally and politically “Third World” countries like Singapore.

Even if our brilliant young Malaysian Obama could fend off those temptations and opt for a career in politics, his path would not be fast or clear. For one, he would have difficulty being accepted by the local party branch as those insecure village leaders would be wary of new challengers. Even if he were to be accepted, there would not be a Kerry-like senior figure to grease the path. Malaysian leaders promote only their kith and kind, not some unknown talent no matter how promising.

Lastly, the political structure and hierarchy in Malaysia do not lend themselves to such rapid renewals of leadership. The pattern is akin to the landing slots at major airports, with the third or fourth tier leaders all dutifully lining up taking their turns. If perchance one proves later to be a dud, it matters not; his or her turn is coming up anyway.

There is indeed a Malaysian Obama out there, but nobody cares or would bother to find or nurture him. That unfortunately is a loss for him, but more so for the nation.

11 comments:

IhateRACISTS said...

Defintely SPOT ON! I represent Generation Y and it sickens me to the core that youngsters nowadays are more racially aggressive towards each other.

You know what, many youth nowadays are ignorant of the current situation. These hybrids could actually be the solution to resolving the racial tension in Malaysia.

Hybrids paving the way for a brighter future...

NH said...

Why, it also did cross my mind that Malaysia had its Obama in Dr. Mahathir Mohammad.

He is of mixed parentage, majority religion and culture,well-educated, charismatic.

ytchuan said...

I echo your view on this. And despite my disagreement towards what Tun Mahathir have done during his reign of power, I got to admit that he was our Obama, abeit our oversight at that point of time, nor did we associate such character to any existing leader as a point of reference.

However, to my opinion, Obama is an accidental 'hero'. He has such fame, other than the fact that he transcend existing race boundary due to his genetic make-up and appearence, it is his visionary ideas, that manage to capture the imagination of the crowd.

The Obama effect, comes only AFTER his ability to capture the imagination of the common American, not before.

Just like our Tun, who was a visionary, and it almost transcend the boundary of our race line at that time. Due to limited public access to the media at that time unlike the present day internet age of wikipaedia, not many share the common knowledge of the racial background of Tun, but it did not hamper the effect of such Visionaries.

I therefore share your view on our own Obama, but not due to the knowledge of his racial make-up, but a trait share among the greatest in human leaders - his Visionary ideas, which manage to capture the rakyat's imaginations, instill hope among the rakyat, and for those who have seen the ills of the existing public political infrastructure, a long-awaiting hope to have a new beginning.

This is what Obama Effect means.

Goostee said...

On the contrary, Mahathir was no less than a dictator. Despite his 22 years at the helm, he would have clung to power if Pak Lah had not promised him what he wanted. Now the cat in the bag is out in the form of "power to Mukhriz" in not too distant in the future.

Old Fart said...

Biologically speaking, of course, Mahathir is Malaysia's Obama. However, ideologically speaking they'd be opposites.

Obama did not need to utter a single word about race in getting to where he has. Only, he needed to deny that he was Muslim in a constituency where that, at this time, matters.

Obama did not need the demonising of any one part of the constituency so that a majority will, out of fear, support him. Mahathir in every which way had to almost always have to leave a reminder to the majority that there was a minority that wanted their space.

Obama talked of isses, policies, economics and economic pathways. Mahathir talked of fear, supremacy, and the building of an attitude that ensured UMNO was looked upon as the defender of the race and faith. Indeed UMNO is the new "crusader". The defenders of the race and faith that without it will be under threat. That state of uncertainty has to forever be maintained for UMNO to perpetuate itself.

Yes, the majority race here is quite opposite in welcoming "others" into their midst, unlike the majority in the United States of America. Only proviso, the "others" have got to be Muslim.

kayuu said...

MAHATHIR IS NO OBAMA.
Obama is unity and tolerance
Mahathir is divide and rule
Obama is change
Mahathir is more of the same
Obama is foward looking
Mahathir longs for the past
Obama is hope
Mahathir is fear and Ketuanan Melayu
America awaits Obama's presidency in earnest
Malaysia sees the dark clouds of Mahathirism in the horizon

NH said...

Mr. Old Fart says,
“Yes, the majority race here is quite opposite in welcoming "others" into their midst, unlike the majority in the United States of America. Only proviso, the "others" have got to be Muslim.”

There’s a reason why that is so. It’s been told over and over again throughout human history. It’s called self-preservation.


Laments one Bishop Tutu in Africa ,

"When the Missionaries came to Africa, they had the Bible & we had the land. They said ‘Let us pray.’ We closed our eyes. When we opened them, we had the Bible & they had the land."

Ponder, before that, the fate of the native Indians in North America. Kind and hospitable to the Mayflower pilgrims who landed but not for long were utterly crushed and humiliated by the “guests” who then took over the their whole land, lock, stock and barrel.

In the southeast Asian port of Malacca, the natives were kind and hospitable too to the Portuguese and the English, welcomed them for trade and diplomacy when they came a-calling, unaware that the visitors’ boats were laden with cannonballs and gunpowder, and oblivious of the greater agenda pre-planned from the armchairs of Europe.

The rest, as they say, is history. Sir Francis Light “founded” Penang, Sir Stamford Raffles “founded” Singapore as printed in the history books and as I had to memorise these “facts” for the exams.

“The proviso”, as Mr. Fart mentions, that “the others have got to be Muslim”, is perhaps to ensure that these others who come into their/our midst will conform to the agenda of the prevailing majority. Well, at least they say they revere the same familiar holy book. They will not turn around and betray the hosts' trust, will they? Like the Mayflower pilgrims, the Puritans and their cohorts, the missionaries in Africa?

(Interesting point of note: the Malaccan Babas and Nonyas are not like these Puritan lot who came to dominate and take over, they instead assimilated into the local culture, adopting the language, clothing, food, etc.)

Perhaps the time has come for us to transcend the notion of self-preservation and leap into the unknown empty-handed with total trust, I don’t know. Not trust God but tie the camel, but trust God and don't tie the camel.

But if you look back into history, that’s what you see. History also says that those who do not learn from history, are condemned to repeat it.

Eric A 10-3 said...

NH,

would you mind to share how many Malaccan Babas and Nonyas are muslims? Does it make them any less Malaysian?
I think West Malaysians like you should think about your "come not to dominate" when dealing with East Malaysia. If more West Malaysian people could walk their talk, instead of purely preaching, it would help make their speech a tad credible.
Last point, for your information, the colonialists left Malaysia in 1957 and 1963. You may want to keep harping on the past, but it won't improve the country an ounce.

NH said...
This post has been removed by the author.
NH said...

Dear eric a 10-13,

You’re right the Babas and Nonyas are no less Malaysian even as they are not Muslim. But, you’ll agree that they have pretty much adopted the local culture where they have lived for hundreds of years. And one doesn’t have to be Muslim, Christian or Pagan, for that matter, to be a good citizen of a community.

But you wouldn’t know that I’m one of those who have gone to work in East Malaysia and have felt the contempt of some of the local folks who thought people from the peninsular cannot not "come not to dominate". It’s a sorry state of affair for those who go there and are seen to dominate the local people and for the local people who assume people who go there from here only come to dominate over them. But we can follow a better script.

On that last point, I especially beg to differ, the colonialists did physically leave in 1957 and 1963 as you say. But their legacy is the untold damage almost beyond redemption of material, mental, emotional, religious and spiritual subjugation done to the collective psyche of the people, that the people are still suffering from and labouring under largely unsuspectingly, that academicians, anthropologists from the West and East cannot hope of ever finishing cataloguing and detailing it.

So pervasive is the cultural and psychological trauma on the former colonies and their people that it is normalized. Even the subjects barely suspect or are even incredulous if it is suggested that they have, for generations, been traumatized and schizoid as a result of the colonial subjugation. But the signs are everywhere. All around us. My speaking in foreign tongue is but one of the symptoms, albeit a glaring one even to myself.

Yes, physically gone but the colonial infrastructure and edifice are already firmly in place: political, legal, religion, military, warfare, language, education, culture, architecture, so on and so forth. The discourse has been framed. There is no other language. The mind is captured. Oh, well…

din merican said...

Ask Bakri for my comments. I have nothing more to say. Din Merican